bound « iterator

1.	assembly
2.	buffer
3.	Card
4.	Cast
5.	compile
6.	console
7.	const
8.	constructor
9.	database
10.	Date
11.	Debug
12.	Design
13.	Development
14.	DLL
15.	encrypt
16.	enum
17.	eof
18.	Event
19.	fork
20.	Format
21.	gcc
22.	gdb
23.	graph
24.	graphics
25.	gui
26.	Holiday Event
27.	image
28.	IP
29.	iterator
30.	macro
31.	makefile
32.	malloc
33.	Menu
34.	mysql
35.	network
36.	openssl
37.	operator
38.	password
39.	pipe
40.	preprocessor
41.	printf
42.	pthread
43.	Regular expression
44.	scanf
45.	semaphore
46.	SerialPort
47.	server
48.	Socket
49.	sql
50.	SQLserver
51.	sscanf
52.	std
53.	stdin
54.	stdout
55.	stl
56.	strcmp
57.	stream
58.	switch
59.	Template
60.	thread
61.	timer
62.	unix
63.	video
64.	Virtual
65.	visualstudio
66.	winapi
67.	windows
68.	xml

C Q&A » iterator » bound

1. STL map: reverse iterator for lower_bound? bytes.com

On 2008-04-03 23:07, qlin88@gmail.com wrote: Hi, > In STL multi-map, the lower_bound, upper_bound,equal_range all return an iterator. Now ifone wants to iterate from an upper bound towards a lower bound, what would be the best way to do it? > I tried to interate backwards with an iterator, but the begin() element was not properly included. You can use reverse_iterators and ...

2. Class design with tightly bound iterator bytes.com

P: n/a Jim Langston I am working on a class design to contain the indices of triangle lists for body parts. This is for 3d modeling. As as start I have: class PartTriangles { public: PartTriangels( const std::string& Name ): Name( Name ) {} private: std::string Name; std::set

3. must iterator be bound to owner/source? bytes.com

I have a deque-like container that I want to give segmented iterators. The implementation uses pool allocation where iterators use indices instead of pointers. The standard iterator type has a reference to the pool and an index. The local_iterator type, which is used within a pool range, just needs an index to operate. But this means that a local iterator from ...

4. What is the defined behavior of past bound iterator bytes.com

I'm wondering is the standard defined behavior of past bound iterator. In the following example it seems that afer first "--it", it point to -1 index. I'm wondering if it is true independent of which STL implementation that I am using. #include #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { std::vector v; for(int i = 0; i < 10; ++ ...

bound « iterator « C Q&A

1. STL map: reverse iterator for lower_bound? bytes.com

2. Class design with tightly bound iterator bytes.com

3. must iterator be bound to owner/source? bytes.com

4. What is the defined behavior of past bound iterator bytes.com