What is the reason why Wrapper classes (like Integer, Double, etc.) don't have a setter for their inner primitive value ?
I am asking this because that kind of functionality would have ...
Two points: 1. (and I admit this is redundant but I want to add my spin): There's an important difference between an object and a reference to an object. When you say Integer myInteger; you are declaring a reference to an object, but the object doesn't exist. When you say Integer myInteger = new Integer(3); you are both creating an object ...