nio « UDP « Java Network Q&A

Home
Java Network Q&A
1.API
2.bluetooth
3.Client
4.connection
5.Cookie
6.Development
7.Email
8.File
9.ftp
10.http
11.HttpClient
12.https
13.ip
14.Network
15.OS
16.RMI
17.Security
18.Server
19.Socket
20.tcp
21.UDP
22.url
Java Network Q&A » UDP » nio 

1. Non-blocking UDP I/O vs blocking UDP I/O in Java    stackoverflow.com

Non-blocking TCP/IP SocketChannels and Selector in NIO help me to handle many TCP/IP connections with small number of threads. But how about UDP DatagramChannels? (I must admit that I'm ...

2. Java NIO UDP - Selector Hangs when trying to register    stackoverflow.com

final DatagramChannel dc = DatagramChannel.open();
        dc.configureBlocking(false);
        dc.socket().bind(localAddress);
        final SelDatagramChannel c ...

3. Should I use (non-blocking) NIO for UDP?    stackoverflow.com

According to this post, UDP just doesn't block. Are there any advantage using the (non-blocking) NIO API for UDP? Or should I just use the easier "traditional" io API?

4. Alternatives to ByteBuffers for a low-level UDP messaging system    stackoverflow.com

I'm working on a low-level UDP messaging layer for an encrypted P2P architecture, if interested you can read more about it on its github page. I've built a neat serialization ...

6. Nio udp with selectors    forums.oracle.com

JGroups supports UDP but only old IO. However Grizzly Messaging uses NIO UDP. [https://grizzly.dev.java.net/nonav/xref/index.html] e.g. [https://grizzly.dev.java.net/nonav/xref/com/sun/grizzly/UDPConnectorHandler.html] I would be interested if you get UDP working over the internet. I would have thought the packet loss rate would be too high and too unpredictable to make it worth using (compared with TCP). So if you can prove me wrong please let me ...

java2s.com  | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Copyright 2009 - 12 Demo Source and Support. All rights reserved.
All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.